Denmark as soon as welcomed refugees—now it barely lets them in. How did a liberal nation create Europe’s harshest immigration system? We dig into the insurance policies, the politics, and what occurs subsequent.
Go deeper than the video — the total written evaluation, plus our free twice-weekly briefing.
https://go.fronts.co/homefronts?v=H_HCCdtKk40
supply
13:26
If a similar 'Parallel Societies Law ' was put in place for London the population would reduce from 9 million down to 6 million
As a Dane it’s interesting to hear how supposedly we’re one of the harshest countries in relation to immigration and then look around at home and still seeing them everywhere.
We need to go further.
6:28 a politican changing with the people will is good not cynical
maybe they should quit destroying our culture.
The good with DK is that a SOCIALDEMOCRATIC land reached this amazing result
omg of course they should aprove Ukranian refugees more than asian bcs they r not uga-bugas they pretty close to europe and the war srarted not that long ago they are a normal country
mette fredriksen is not a socialist calling her that is a mockery of political theorem
I wish our Social Democrats also woke up to this problem. A decade later, they are still not. /Sweden
This has to be done across Europe so that it can be saved
One of Europe's biggest political contradictions is this: if the EU's largest countries—Germany, France, Italy and Spain—continue admitting large numbers of migrants and many eventually obtain citizenship, then those individuals become EU citizens with the right to move, live and work anywhere in the Union. That is one of the EU's four fundamental freedoms. Smaller member states may spend enormous political and financial resources trying to reduce immigration today, yet they cannot permanently isolate themselves from demographic changes occurring elsewhere in the Union.
This does not mean that migration policy is pointless. States still control who enters their territory from outside the EU, how asylum claims are processed, and the conditions for granting citizenship. Moreover, naturalization rules differ significantly between member states and often require many years of legal residence, language proficiency, and integration. But once someone legally becomes a citizen of an EU member state, freedom of movement applies across the Union.
This raises a legitimate strategic question: can migration be effectively addressed by individual countries alone, or does it require a genuinely coordinated European policy? If the largest member states pursue substantially different migration and naturalization policies from smaller ones, the long-term demographic effects will inevitably be shared across the EU's border-free internal market.
Whether one supports higher or lower immigration, this is a debate about consistency rather than ideology. In a union built on free movement, national migration policies cannot be viewed in isolation.
Can somoene tell me, what happend to Lebanon, and why it isnt majority christian country anymore? Was is msulim mass migration, and then war? Ooh noes, how did taht come to be. Zero migration policy effectivness? Go and look whats it looks like in Poland and compare to England. There is a difference you can see and smell.
The socialdemocrats hasn´t been a left-wing party since 1920!
Better safe than sorry 😁
Honestly, China’s playing the game well.
Why on earth do European countries are expected to take in Muslim refugees when Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States bring in thousands of non-Muslim workers from India, the Philippines , and elsewhere?
So Europe imported a bunch of women hoping they would get to reproduce and use them as sex slaves. Then when men came Europe got all mad about it and wants the men going. They want to take the women's children and remove them because if they're little boys they have no use.
Let's be clear: Nobody should care about what radical groups like 'Amnesty International' have to say about anything. And let's also not mince words: There is no legitimate argument against what Denmark is and has been doing. They are putting the general welfare of their citizens at the forefront of their governmental policy, and that is nothing but commendable. Denmark is a role model for the rest of Europe; ALWAYS take care of your people first before addressing the needs of foreigners, especially those who abuse the welfare systems across Europe and who refuse to assimilate and integrate.
Mette is doing a wonderful job, and she deserves to win another term as PM in the next election. I can only hope that the Danish people are wise and feel the same. If they foolishly vote to hand the country over to far left parties, Denmark will be unrecognizable in 10 years tops. Choose wisely, Danes.
Denmark just granted 5000 syrians permanent stay and i wonder why , when they are needed in their own country to rebuild
Notice how political attitudes are grouped as "liberal," "moderate," or "far right." The one label you never hear is "far left," and anyone with any concerns about rapid immigration are automatically labeled "far right." "Activists" are always treated as unquestionably virtuous and moral, while citizens who disagree with the activists are dismissed as bigots.
I’m a Ukrainian refugee in Denmark. I’m doing my best to learn the language (at this point I’m not entitled to free Danish lessons, so I’m paying my own money for private classes because I think it’s important and respectful). I’m learning about Danish way of living, traditions and thank Danish people at any chance. And I think this is the least I can do to express my gratitude.
I wish countries would move away from a "collective punishment" approach to an approach that looks at the choices and wishes of each individual. If you migrate to a different country and become a model citizen and an asset, you should be rewarded. Conversely, someone from the same country of origin as you who decides to become a hazard to the local population (immigrants and natives alike) should be expelled. Easy-peasy, you reward good behaviour and punish bad behaviour. Or in other words: You weed out the destructive elements by repatriating them and prohibiting them from re-entering for X number of years, depending on the severity of their crime. While the ones who add value to society (or who show potential to do so in the future) should be rewarded with incentives such as residence permits.
IT’s the way to go, if only other countries had the balls to follow suit.
If you can't shake hands with someone of the opposite sex, you aren't compatible with western culture.
No to immigration, yes to mass deportation
denmark was the first european nation to sober up and realize how much of a disaster this immigration policies have been
23:23 yes ukrainian plight should matter more then sudan. Ukrainians are fellow europeans. Real fucking easy
Massive W for denmark.
Denmark is fucking MASTERING passive aggressive migration policy
Why did they flee west and not to like turkey
These Muslims don't assimilate and have large families so this is an invasion. So, no Muslims or Africans should be allowed in Europe or Europe will be destroyed like Sweden, the UK, and France have been.
Reason why ukranians are more welcome, is becaise they have western values, most of them are christian which makes them more compatible
Labour shortage problems will largely be solved in an era of AI and Robotics. Like it or not, that largely removes the economic case for mass migration.
Let me come with an extra comment as a born Dane living in Denmark. When the young "real" Danes leave Denmark for the Golf "Dubai dream" etc etc Denmark is wining and complaining why Danes would leave for the middle east just show the hyporcasy right. They want to force some out but still force Danes to stay within the boarders. Just saying !! Soon Denmark will try and isolate itself they just haven't realized it yet it's laughable.
Not saying its easy but Danish is far from an actually extremely hard language
Come back to this in 15/20 years, when Denmark has an ageing population and no one to pay for their pensions
If only the UK was as enlightened as Denmark.
After looking into Germany, Denmark, Sweden, and Poland's immigration policies, I would love to see a video analyzing Italy's, to learn more about my own country and see if Meloni's promises have been kept or if it was just propaganda…
We danes should have done like the singaporeans.
Someone saying they are trying to take an unbiased take and actually doing so? Rare and appreciated
i hope the rest of Europe does the same.. and follow danmark.
Facts are facts. People will go flailing around and stomping calling you names and ttying to gaslight you but you cannot ignore numbers. They don't lie.
Danish immigration policy is still way too lenient. We will need to change some of the international conventions that hinder our ability to expel and deport criminals and illegal migrants.
Migration from MENAPT-countries will never be a solution to population decline – it will only lead to population replacement.
This just all makes sense.
Oh no a Colonizer country is upset that people are migrating there? Is anyone surprised lol
Welp looks like the Danish fash found this video. Boy howdy. When Denmark's demographics and economics collapse due to its aging population, joke's gonna be on them. Countries that shut themselves off from the world inevitably fall behind. It's how China went from the center of human civilization to a backwater hacked apart by foreign powers. Look at the history of China from about 1880 to 1940. That's the future of Europe if they don't wise up and open themselves up to more people, ideas, labor, trade, and cultural exchange.
I hope we in Canada move in a similar direction.
Wow, you take out the trash and it cleans up. SURPRISE!!! Logic actually works. 😂
Anyone that believes in magic dirt theory needs to be culled.